Showing posts with label Disciples. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disciples. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

#58 Ministers of Jesus Must be Called of God




#58 Ministers of Jesus Must be Called of God
Matthew 8:18-22; Luke 9:57-62

Jesus and his disciples are preparing to leave the area. It has been a long day of crowds of people approving, challenging, and criticizing his teachings. He has now begun teaching in parables.  His audience is well-familiar with this style but they have not heard it from him before, and so there are even more questions. Much healing has been done, and learning within his small band of chosen disciples. All are tired.

The scriptures include three individuals coming to talk to Jesus about joining and going with him. We do not know the timing of these meetings. Jesus uses them as teaching situations to show the worldly sacrifice that is required and what must first be considered when one makes such a commitment to Him.

Apostle James E. Talmage:

While Jesus and his disciples are making ready the boat to cross the lake a certain scribe came to him and said, “Master, I will follow thee withersoever thou goest.” Few men of the titled or ruling class offered so openly to align themselves with Jesus. Official recognition by a scribe, one of standing and importance in the community, would appear to be an asset to their labors.   Jesus knows the hearts and minds of us all. He does the choosing and accepting. “In this instance, Christ knew the character of the man, and, without wounding his feelings by curt rejection, pointed out the sacrifice required of one who would follow whithersoever the Lord went, saying: ‘the foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.’” We do not read that the aspiring scribe pressed his offer.
“Another man indicated his willingness to follow the Lord, but asked first for time to go and bury his father; to him Jesus said: ‘Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.’ Some have felt that this injunction was harsh. While it would be manifestly unfilial for a son to absent himself from his father’s funeral under ordinary conditions, nevertheless, if that son had been set apart to service of importance transcending all personal or family obligations, his ministerial duty would of right take precedence. The requirement expressed by Jesus was no greater than that made of every priest during his term of active service, nor was it more afflicting than the obligation of the Nazarite vow, under which many voluntarily placed themselves. The duties of ministry in the kingdom pertained to spiritual life; one dedicated thereto might well allow those who were negligent of spiritual things, and figuratively speaking, spiritually dead, to bury their dead.
“A third instance is presented; a man who wanted to be a disciple of the Lord asked that, before entering upon his duties, he be permitted to go home and bid farewell to his family and friends.   The reply of Jesus has become an aphorism in life and literature: ‘No man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.’”
                                                                                         
It is good to remember that during his three - year ministry one of the important, or even the most important thing, our Savior had to accomplish was to prepare the Twelve Apostles to continue leading the church after he leaves the earth. All these things they will need to know and do in his absence.

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie:

“Men do not choose to be ministers of Christ; rather he selects whom he will to represent him. ‘Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you,’ is the way he later explained this doctrine to the Twelve. When men are called of God by the spirit of revelation, called in the omnipotent wisdom of him who knoweth all things, those calls take precedence over all conflicting interests. Missionaries so sent forth habitually forsake all personal and family obligations. Loved ones may pass away, but missionaries remain at their posts, preaching the kingdom of God.” 

Glenn R. McGettigan
March 2019

References

“Jesus the Christ.” Talmage
“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” Volume 1. McConkie
“The Mortal Messiah.” Volume 2. McConkie
“Scriptural Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith.” Smith




















                      

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

#49 John Sends Disciples to Jesus


#49 John Sends Disciples to Jesus
Please first read: Matthew 11:2-30; Luke 7:18-35


Jesus continues his ministry in Galilee. He has drawn crowds of people but there has been opposition … many people refuse to repent and believe. He has just left Nain and word of his raising the dead son of the widow has gone throughout all Judea and Samaria. It is now summer and John the Baptist (JB) has been in Herod’s prison at Machaerus Castle since last fall. It is possible that news of the events at Nain have already reached John. There is no question in JB’s mind regarding Jesus. He knows Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God. He is now trying to get his faithful disciples to understand they are to leave JB; his mission for God is through. They are now to transfer their allegiance to the one for whom John prepared the way. It is understandable they would be reluctant to leave John, and him in prison as well. Since Jesus in now in the area John may very well wonder if Jesus intends to free him from prison. This action by JB of sending his disciples to Jesus is a final great testimony that Jesus is the Lamb of God. He is relying on their seeing and hearing the Master, the Spirit will prompt them to go to this greater light.                                                                                                                                                                                               

Points considered in these scriptures:
·         Getting JB’s followers to now follow Jesus
·         Jesus’ efforts to make this happen … he does not say “yes” to their question
·         Jesus testifies of John the Baptist
·         The people have had two different messengers from God testify of the Messiah who is now here … many have refused both of them
·         Jesus testifies of himself

John’s disciples come and ask Jesus if he is the One, the Messiah, or should they be looking for another. Instead of saying “yes” Jesus makes them think of the marvelous things they have seen, and heard him do, and then sends them back to John who will give testimony and confirmation of Jesus as the Messiah. A new age has dawned … new words and new deeds are appearing.   They are seeing and hearing these events against the many-centuries-taught expectation the Messiah will come with great power and over-throw all Israel’s enemies. (They expect the second coming.)

When they went out to see JB who and what did they expect to see? A reed shaking in the wind … someone fickle, of easy persuasion? Someone clothed in soft raiment … someone weak, unsure? What they did see was a prophet in the style of the Old Testament dispensation … rough, strong, forceful, unbending, fearless. They reject John, they believe he has devil in him.

Now Jesus comes with a sympathetic, loving heart, healing and helping, and they call him a “winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. He offers evidence of being the Messiah and teaches from Old Testament prophecies (Isaiah and others) that the time of salvation has come, but they reject him also.

Luke 7:28: No greater prophet than John the Baptist.

·         He was chosen to prepare the earthly way before the Lord.  A signal honor.
·         He baptized the Savior.
·         He was the only legal administrator with Priesthood keys and powers on earth in the Eastern Hemisphere.

Matthew 11:11; Luke 7:28:  

“he (Jesus) that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he (John.)”
Joseph Smith said: “Jesus was looked upon as having the least claim in God’s kingdom, and (seemingly) was least entitled to their credulity as a prophet; as though he had said, “He that is considered the least among you is greater than John – that is I myself.” (“Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith,” p.276)

Matthew 11: 16-19; Luke 7:31-35:

“What illustration can I choose to show how petty, peevish, and insincere are you unbelieving Jews? You are like fickle children playing games; when you hold a mock wedding, your playmates refuse to dance; when you change the game to a funeral procession, your playmates refuse to mourn. In like manner you are only playing at religion. As cross and capricious children you reject John because he came with the strictness of the Nazarites, and ye reject me because I display the warm human demeanor that makes for pleasant social intercourse.” (“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary,” volume one, Bruce R. McConkie)     

Matthew 11:20-24:

“Woe,” Judgement of the cities … Chorazin, Bethsaida, Capernaum. Translation of the word “woe” means/reveals judgement not as a curse but more as pity and sorrow than anger.      Capernaum was Jesus’ home city for his work in this Galilee area. It was beautiful, well-populated, on the Sea of Galilee, economically prosperous with fishing, agriculture, and a commercial center. There was a toll station there … caravan routes passed through … and a military post. Jesus did much of his teaching here and in the surrounding cities and areas. This passage is a strong warning as to the unbelief of these cities. In the final wars between Rome and the Jews, Capernaum and the surrounding towns were obliterated; this area was almost totally destroyed. Only the ruins of a later synagogue remain.

Prophet Spencer W. Kimball:

President Kimball loved to walk in the paths of Jesus. He once visited the site of the three cities mentioned herein and shared the following in a Conference talk in April 1961:

“We asked our guide for the cities in which Jesus lived and performed so many miracles, for we remember that in this area of but few miles, much of his work was done, much of his ministry was accomplished. We would like to walk through the triplet cities he so often visited: Bethsaida, Chorazin, and Capernaum. We see no spires nor towers, nor walls. We ask our guide:  Where is Chorazin? He shakes his head. There is no Chorazin. We conclude it must have been on those hills where now are sprouting grain and vegetables and dry weeds.

“Then where is Bethsaida? We ask. Where is that noted city where so many sick were healed and the lame were made to walk; where deaf could hear and lepers lost their curse? Where is his favorite place he often lodged, the home of Andrew, Peter, and Philip, his dearest friends?   Where is Bethsaida? the house of fishers, the place of miracles, the seat of gospel teachings, where fishermen became apostles? In these very few miles much of interest happened. Where is Bethsaida? Our guide shakes his head again. There is no Bethsaida.

“Capernaum, then? We ask. Where is that important place, the port where fish were loaded, traded, marketed? He shakes his head again, then smiles as he thinks it through and changes the accent, and, Oh, you mean CaperNAUM. He shows us the ruins of a large synagogue. If this is of the Messianic period … it is the sole survivor. A back wall, great stones tumbled in disarray.   But (this IS) Capernaum, his own city, the great Capernaum, the haughty, wicked rebellious, Capernaum!”

Glenn R. McGettigan
February 2016

References: 

“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” Volume 1. McConkie
“Jesus the Christ.” Talmage
“Our Lord of the Gospels.” Clark
“Complete Biblical Library: Matthew and Luke.”
“Communicator’s Commentary: Mathew and Luke.”  
“Companion Study of the New Testament.” Ludlow

#45 Jesus Calls The Twelves Apostles


#45 Jesus Calls The Twelve Apostles

Apostle James E. Talmage:


“A survey of the general characteristics and qualifications of this body of twelve men reveals some interesting facts. Before their selection as apostles they had all become close disciples of the Lord; they believed in Him; several of them, possibly all, had openly confessed that He was the Son of God; and yet it is doubtful that any one of them fully understood the real significance of the Savior’s work.

It is evident by the late remarks of many of them, and by the instructions and rebuke they called forth from the Master, that the common Jewish expectation of a Messiah who would reign in splendor as an earthly sovereign after He had subdued all other nations, had a place even in the hearts of these chosen ones. After long experience, Peter’s concern was: “Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?” They were as children to be trained and taught; but they were mostly willing pupils, receptive of soul, and imbued with a sincere eagerness to serve. To Jesus they were His little ones, His children, His servants, and His friends, as they merited. They were all of the common people, not rabbis, scholars, nor priestly officials. Their inner natures, not their outward accomplishments were taken into prime account in the Lord’s choosing. The Master chose them; they did not choose themselves; by Him they were ordained, and they could in consequence rely the more implicitly upon His guidance and support. To them much was given; and much was required. With the one black exception they all became shining lights in the kingdom of God, and vindicated the Master’s selection. He recognized in each the characteristics of fitness developed in the primeval world of spirits.” (Chapter 16)



“Calling to him his twelve disciples, he gave them authority to cast out evil spirits, and to heal every disease and every infirmity. These twelve Jesus sent on a mission, charging them as follows: Do not go along the route of the Gentiles, and do not enter a Samaritan town (again). Go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and as you go, proclaim that the Kingdom of heaven is fast approaching. Heal the sick, cure lepers, cast out demons. You received without paying anything … give without payment. Do not carry gold, silver, or copper coin in your belts, no bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor a staff. The worker deserves his keep. Find out who is suitable in any town or village you enter, and stay there until you leave. As you enter the house, greet it, and if the house is deserving, then let your blessing rest upon it. If it is undeserving, let your blessing return to you. If anyone will not receive you, or listen to your words, then on your departure from that house or town, shake off the dust from your feet. I solemnly declare to you that Sodom and Gomorrah will be in happier case on the day of judgment than that town.” (Matthew 10:1-15)

Augsburger:

Jesus laments about the weary multitudes scattered like sheep and with no compassionate shepherd; ready for the harvest, but no laborers are in sight and many are needed; pray for God to send “shepherds.” How fitting it is that Jesus will now follow his own counsel and call more shepherds. (Matthew 9:35-38)

Larson’s work “Communicator’s Library” provides the following thoughts:


Although Jesus is now well-acquainted with these brethren, he spends the night in prayer and counseling with the Father before calling the Twelve. Among other things, isn’t this showing the example to all who would work in the Lord’s church?   

The time has now arrived for Jesus to begin formally organizing the Church and Kingdom of God on the earth. His ministry has been going about one and a half years (since his baptism by John the Baptist.)

He has established a presence and large groups of followers in Jerusalem and surrounding areas of his choosing. The Church Jesus will now organize and the gospel it will present will be (in full or in part) the same as in previous dispensations, and the same as today’s restored Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. “First apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers … after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.” 
(1 Cor. 12:28 – signs of the true church) (Luke 6:12-13)

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie


For these twelve “there was no happenstance in their calls; they had been foreordained by Him who knows all things and who had prepared them from all eternity to be his ministers in the meridian day.”

Witnesses of the Redeemer ... humble folk, weak and simple Galileans, unlearned in Rabbinic lore, but men who could be taught from on high, whose souls will vibrate as the revelations of eternity pour in upon them.” They are the ones Lehi, Nephi, Abraham, Jeremiah and other prophets saw in vision and who were chosen to be rulers before they were born. We know very little detail about the original twelve individuals, but as ordained apostles we know they went forward teaching, preaching, baptizing, ordaining, calling others, bestowing the gift of the Holy Ghost, arbitrating, doing miracles and healings, testifying, rebuking evil … they were fearless in the performance of their office.      

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie:

The ordaining of the Twelve to the Apostleship was a/the major step in Jesus’ final organizing of his earthly Church and Kingdom.  As he prepares them to eventually preside over the affairs of his Church in his absence, they will also be given the Keys and Priesthood authority to do so.

Jesus had such zeal in his ministerial labors he would neglect to stop and eat or rest and care for his physical needs. His followers were concerned for his well-being and referred to him as one “beside himself,” as we sometimes do today. (Mark 3:20-21)

Eleven of the original twelve apostles were from the province of Galilee, where Jesus made his home at Capernaum during much of his active ministry. One apostle, Judas, was from the province of Judea wherein Jerusalem was located.

Glenn R. McGettigan
January 2016

References:

Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” McConkie
“The Mortal Messiah.” Book 2. McConkie
“Communicator’s Library.” Larson
“Communicator’s Commentary.” Augsburger
“Jesus the Christ.” Talmage
“A New Translation.” Albright and Mann


#42 The Disciples Pick Corn on the Sabbath



#42 The Disciples Pick Corn on the Sabbath
Please first read: Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28; Luke 6:1-5

J. Reuben Clark Jr.:

The disciples, hungry and going through a field of corn, pluck the ears of corn and eat them; the Pharisees charge them with violating the Sabbath; in justification Jesus cites David’s eating of the shewbread, that the priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless; declares that in this place  there is one greater than the Temple, and that the “Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath day.

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie:

After a number of days at Jerusalem for his second Passover Feast (some authorities believe this is a different feast than the Passover) Jesus and his disciples leave Judea and walk back again to Galilee. Judea is no longer a safe place for them, especially in Jerusalem. Jesus’ various teachings during the days there have caused serious animosity and hatred among various Jewish leaders … to the point of some seeking to put him to death. (See post #41.1 and #41.2) They have objected to most of his teachings, but especially to his accusations that they desecrate the Sabbath, and that he makes himself the equal with God. These are two of the main law violations that call for the death penalty. Many in Galilee are of this same opinion, but not to the degree as in Jerusalem.

It is again the Sabbath and Jesus is again in violation of their sacred Sabbath. As he and the others with him walk through cornfields they are hungry, so they pluck some ears of corn and eat the kernels. Under Jewish law it is permissible to do this from fields of others to satisfy one’s hunger, just not on the Sabbath. They are accused of both reaping (picking the corn) and harvesting (rubbing off the kernels) both of which violate Rabbinic (not biblical) law. Both of these could be considered capital offenses. It appears that Jesus was not so engaged and is not accused thereof, but his disciples.

Jesus defends his friends … they have done no wrong. By the Jews own traditions Sabbath observance becomes secondary to a higher law in proper cases. He cites when David and those with him went into the house of God and partook of the priest’s shewbread. Hunger and being on the Lord’ errand supersedes the Sabbath law. He also reminds them how temple priests do all the works involved to offer sacrifices on the Sabbath and are held blameless. Then he turns to their own scriptures stating that mercy is more important than ritualistic sacrifices. (Hosea 6:6)   Probably the most objectionable and distasteful words for them to finally hear (as recorded by the scriptures) would be that he (Jesus) “the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath” (Matthew and Luke) and he “is one greater than the Temple.” (Matthew)

Albright and Mann:

Plucking ears of grain was one of 39 major kinds of work forbidden on the Sabbath by Rabbinic law. The disciples technically are breaking the law but out of pressure of hunger, which can be allowed.

Apostle James E. Talmage:

Mosaic Law provides that when traveling through another’s field one is allowed to pick sufficient corn, grapes, fruit etc. to satisfy hunger.

Ludlow:

David and the Shewbread. The bread the priests had was consecrated for their use only.   Because of the urgent need of David and the hungry men with him the priests gave the bread to them. The Jewish leaders listening knew that Jesus was declaring himself to be the Messiah, the Anointed One when he used the phrase … “one greater than the Temple.”

The JST of Mark 2:27 clarifies: “For the Son of Man made the Sabbath day, therefore the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath.”

Howick:

It had been some 400 years since the last of the Old Testament prophets. Over time the Rabbis had become the spiritual leaders and teachers of the Law. As they increasingly interpreted and made rulings and gave detailed instructions, the volume of law (now Rabbinic rulings) grew as layer was added to layer. Over time the words of the Rabbis were given precedent/priority over most everything else. At the time of Jesus the scribes were also much involved in influencing these activities.

The traditional law had three parts:

1.      The written Law of Moses.
2.      The oral law: traditional teachings implied or deduced from the Law of Moses.
3.      Oral teachings of the Rabbis: the “Hedge” placed around the law “to prevent any breach of the law or customs, to ensure exact observance” in all circumstances. This volume of rules was ever increasing.

Rules for the Sabbath had grown into a law controlling all other laws … requiring even stricter interpretation governing Jewish activities on the Sabbath.

Holzapfel and Wayment:

To the Jewish leaders, when Jesus here defends his disciples by comparing what had just occurred to David’s eating of the shewbread at the temple, the analogy makes Jesus the equal of David, the king of Israel. He explains his actions by, in effect, declaring himself to be a king and a priest. Then Jesus takes it one step further, he asserts that holiness was not in the law itself but rather in the lawgiver. “The Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath.” (Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5)
Jesus is now challenging and questioning the leader’s interpretation of these laws and rules, thus disparaging their authority to do so.

Glenn R. McGettigan
November 2015  

References:   

“Our Lord of the Gospels.” Clark
“The Mortal Messiah.” Volume 2. McConkie
“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” Volume 1. McConkie  
“Study of the New Testament.” Ludlow
“The Miracles of Jesus the Messiah.” Howick
“The Gospel of Matthew.” Albright & Mann
“Jesus the Christ.” Talmage


#40 John's Disciples Question Jesus About Fasting


#40 John’s Disciples Question Jesus About Fasting
New Doctrine; New Gospel; New Revelation; New Church
Please first read: JST Matthew 9:15-23; Matthew 9:14-17; Mark 2:18-22; Luke 5:33-39

Note: The King James’ version is incomplete, missing some verses. That version implies that Jesus’ remarks about new cloth and new bottles have to do with fasting. The JST adds several verses of scripture that clarify and show Jesus was talking about baptism, not fasting. We also learn that Jesus is the author of the law (of Moses,) that the law is about to be fulfilled in Jesus; and that the Pharisees’ baptism is now useless because the old dispensation is coming to an end. The people need to be baptized into the new dispensation by the proper authority.

“The disciples of John come to Jesus and ask why do not the disciples of Jesus fast as do they and the Pharisees; Jesus answers in parables – children of the bridechamber, a piece of new cloth in an old garment, new wine in old bottles, and new wine against old wine.” John still languishes in prison.

As is quite often the case in an event in the life of our Savior, we need to see it in the eyes of the viewers at that time. We must understand that this Jewish audience has a more negative mind-set about fasting than we do.

The following material deals with fasting as understood and practiced by the Jews in New Testament times, with corrections by Jesus regarding what true and proper fasting should have been. Jesus then includes teachings about fasting within the new Gospel, new Church, new Revelation, and new Doctrine He is bringing.

Edersheim:

Fasting, both public and private, has been a part of evolving Jewish history for many centuries.
Regarding public fasts, “there was only one Divinely-ordained public fast, that of the Day of Atonement. But it was quite in accordance with the will of God, and the spirit of the Old Testament dispensation, that when great national calamities had overtaken Israel or great national wants arose, or great national sins were to be confessed, a day of public fasting and humiliation should be proclaimed.  (Judges 26. 1 Samuel 6; 1 Kings 21; 2 Chronicles 20) To these the Jews added, during the Babylonish captivity, what may be called ‘memorial-fasts,’ on the anniversaries of great national calamites.” This created an unhealthy religious pattern/movement of both private and public humiliation.

In contrast to this there were four other Great Fasts that were observed going back well before the Babylonian captivity to the days of Zechariah (early 700’s BC) … fasts of the fourth, fifth, seventh, and tenth months. Through the prophet Zechariah the Lord told the people these fasts “shall be to the house of Judah joy and gladness, and cheerful feasts; therefore love the truth and peace.”

It was customary to fast during certain weeks at the time of Pentecost and the Feast of Tabernacles on Mondays and Thursdays. People appeared in public in sackcloth and ashes. “In order to be a proper fast, it must be continued from one sundown till after the next, when the stars appeared, and for about twenty-six hours the most rigid abstinence from all food and drink was enjoined. Most solemn as some of these ordinances sound, the New Testament shows how sadly it all degenerated into mere formalism; how frequent fasting became mere work and self-righteousness. Instead of being the expression of true humiliation and the very appearance of the penitent, unwashed and with ashes on his head, it was even made a matter of boasting and religious show.” (Matthew 9:14; Mark 2:18; Luke 5:33; Luke 18:12; Matthew 6:16)
                                                                              

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie:

Jesus has been eating at the home of his newly called disciple, Matthew, the publican.
He is now teaching an audience of his followers, disciples, Pharisees and others. Some of John’s disciples come and with the Pharisees ask Jesus why he and his disciples do not fast. Fasting is a fetish with the Pharisees and they attend to every sacrificial detail. Jesus will now address this and several other matters he is trying to teach. Fasting as such is not to be condemned. There is a proper time, purpose, mind-set, and procedure that is to accompany one’s fasting, and the Jews have lost sight of this. Their fathers had been condemned for fasting for evil purposes. Isaiah rebuked them saying “Behold, ye fast for strife and debate, and to smite with the fist of wickedness. Ye shall not fast as ye do this day, to make your voice to be heard on high.” Jesus teaches they should fast “to loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke … to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house.” (Isaiah 58) How far away from this the leaders and people had strayed.

In all of this the Lord is presenting new doctrine, a new gospel, new revelation, a new church … the law of Moses is now fulfilled. New revelation will not fit in an apostate church. Jesus now uses parables:

·         A new gospel: you do not put a new piece of cloth in an old garment. (Luke 5:36)
·         New revelation: you do not add to a dead religion … new wine must go into new bottles. (Luke 5:37-38)
·         New church, New doctrine: it is difficult for John’s disciples (and others) to switch. (Luke 5:39)

Jesus now uses a word picture, something they are very familiar with: The Bridegroom and his friends. John’s disciples are as friends of the Bridegroom. Jesus asks, “can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the Bridegroom is with them?” And then answers, “as long as they have the Bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.” Jesus, the Bridegroom is with them; why should they mourn or fast? Is it not, rather, a time to rejoice? Then Jesus said, “But the days will come, when the bridegroom will be taken from them and then shall they fast in those days. But their fast will not be to smite with the fist of wickedness, but rather, to draw near unto that Lord who has gone, for a moment from them, but who will return in power and great glory at the appointed time.” There is a proper time for fasting but now is not that time.
                                                                                 

In the Bethany Commentary the author writes:

John’s disciples and the Pharisees may be boasting a little about themselves, and criticizing those who do not fast as they do. Christ defends his recently called disciples … for some of them fasting and other spiritual activities are new experiences … they are just learning. They are babes in Christ, and not grown men.

Ausubel:

The writings of Isaiah were well known and used by the Jewish people. Isaiah, the prophet of the Babylonian captivity in the 6th century BC, defined what fasting should not be: “Is such the fast that I God have (not) chosen, The day for a man to afflict his soul? Is it to bow down his head as a bulrush, and to spread sackcloth and ashes under him? Wilt thou call this a fast and an acceptable day to the Lord?” (Isaiah 58:5) And what it should be: “Is not this the fast that I have chosen? To loose the fetters of wickedness, To undo the bonds of the yoke, And to let the oppressed go free, And that ye break every yoke? Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, And that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house?” (Isaiah 58:6-7) Jesus now cites both of these in his teachings.

Brown:

Fasting was used with purification rites, in preparing to converse with God, by the nation in danger of war and destruction, or plague; at times of exile and mourning the dead. In the course of time the deeper meaning of fasting, as an expression of man’s humbling of himself before God, was lost for Israel. Increasingly it came to be regarded as a pious achievement. The struggle of the prophets against this was without success.

The entirely new view brought by the New Testament to the question of fasting is most clearly expressed in the words of Jesus, “How can the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them?” The irruption of the Kingdom of God, the presence of the Messiah, the good news of salvation not dependent on good works – all this means joy which is now something excluded by fasting in the Jewish sense. In the light of the Messiah-center preaching of Jesus, such fasting is a thing of the past, belonging to a bygone era.

Howick:

The Law of Moses prescribed only one official fast day, the Day of Atonement, but the rabbis had added many public and private fasts. The public fasts generally commemorated the calamities of Israel’s past but the question posed to the Savior was centered around the private fast days wherein the Pharisees aimed at the highest degree of merit obtainable under the observance of their law.

The Pharisees, however, had enlarged the fast even beyond this. They celebrated it for many occasions, believing that fasting would give them lucky dreams and the interpretation thereof, or that it would allow them to receive revelation, avert evil, or procure some good. They reasoned this way because of their concept of hostility between body and spirit. They believed that the spirit could be exalted only by suppressing the body.

To their questioning Jesus responded with another question: “Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them?” Jesus had come to liberate the Jews from the yoke of the Mosaic ordinances and the bondage that had been placed upon them by the traditions of their fathers. His answer also proclaimed that he was the Messiah who had come to declare a new law, not merely reform the old one. The gospel that Jesus taught was a new and everlasting covenant. The old ceremonial law could not be patched.

Additional Notes:

·         There were many instances of individual fasting under the influence of grief, vexation, or anxiety.
·         Even among many of the Jewish leaders fasting as a practice had been relegated to secondary importance.
·         Pride was a real problem for the Pharisees and influenced their fasting practices. Some Pharisees fasted often for very selfish reasons.
                                                                               
Glenn R. McGettigan
September 2015; Revised November 2015

References:

“The Temple.” Edersheim
“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” McConkie
“The Mortal Messiah.” McConkie
“Bethany Commentary.”
“Dictionary of New Testament Theology.” Volume 1. Brown
“Sermons of Jesus the Messiah.” Howick
“Life of Christ.” Farrar
“Gospel of Luke.” Volume 1. Fitzmyer
“Life of Christ.” Geike

                                                                                  



#39 Matthew Called


#39 Matthew Called
Please first read: Matthew 9:9-13; Mark 2:13-17; Luke 5:27-32

President J. Reuben Clark, Jr.:
  
Jesus goes forth again by the seaside, and multitudes follow him, he teaches them; seeing 
Levi - Matthew - son of Alphaeus, sitting at the receipt of custom, he says, “Follow me,” and Matthew follows; Matthew makes a great feast for Jesus (in Matthew’s house) and a great company of publicans and sinners come and sit down; the Pharisees murmur at this, asking why he eats with publicans and sinners; Jesus answers that the sick, not the well, need a physician, and that he comes not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance (some Pharisees may have detected a bit of irony here of Jesus implying that they were at the top of the list of those needing to repent and change.) (p.218)
                                                                          
Apostle Bruce R. McConkie:

By now in His ministry Jesus’ notoriety as a teacher and worker of good (miracles/healings) is established throughout all the Holy Land. Pharisees, Scribes, Sadducees, and “doctors of the law” come from Galilee, Judea and Jerusalem to see and hear Him. Jesus is in the process of restoring the gospel for his day and dispensation. So far he has revealed new doctrine, ordained new officers, approved the baptisms of John, and preformed baptisms himself. In time he will call his Twelve special witnesses, give them the keys of the kingdom, and the power to bind on earth and seal in heaven. (Volume 2. p.55)

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie: 

It appears that when Jesus saw Matthew and said unto him, “Follow me.” Matthew immediately “left all, rose up, and followed him.” Matthew was a Jew. He was also a publican (a collector of taxes for the Romans) and all such were hated and despised by his people. It was particularly offensive for one of their own race to be so engaged. Publicans were customarily considered to be sinners. Rabbis ranked them as cutthroats and robbers, as social outcasts and religiously half-excommunicated. They were forbidden to serve as judges or to give evidence, and it was common to say of them: “A religious man who becomes a publican is to be driven out of the society of religion. It is not lawful to use the riches of such men.”

Matthew was one of these social outcasts; his friends and associates obviously belonged to the same group; and when he gave a feast (a sort of reception) for Jesus, it was publicans and sinners who assembled to meet the Master. When Jewish leaders criticized Jesus for eating and associating with such unsavory individuals, Jesus’ reply was “They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.” The Pharisaic religion was one of ritualistic forms, of rules and ceremonies, of rites and sacrifices; actually, no one needed a physician more than the spiritually sick Pharisees. (p.180)

The author, Farrar, in his book titled “Life of Christ,” provided the following passage:    
At or near Capernaum there was a receipt of custom. Lying as the town did at the nucleus of roads which diverged to Tyre, to Damascus, to Jerusalem, and to Sepphoris, it was a busy centre of merchandise, and therefore a natural place for the collection of tribute and taxes. These imposts were to the Jews pre-eminently distasteful. The mere fact of having to pay them wounded their tenderest sensibilities. They were not only a badge of servitude; not only a daily and terrible witness that God seemed to have forsaken His land, and that all the splendid Messianic hopes and promises of their earlier history were merged in the disastrous twilight of subjugation to a foreign rule which was cruelly and contemptuously enforced; but more than this, the mere payment of such imposts wore almost the appearance of apostasy to the sensitive and scrupulous mind of a genuine Jew. It seemed to be a violation of the first principle of the Theocracy, such as could only be excused as the result of absolute compulsion. We cannot, therefore, wonder that the officers who gathered these taxes were regarded with profound dislike. It must be remembered that those with whom the provincials came into contact were not the Roman knights – the real publican, who farmed the taxes – but were the merest subordinates chosen from the dregs of the people, and so notorious was a class for their mal-practices, that they were regarded almost with horror, and were always included in the same category with harlots and sinners. When an occupation is thus despised and detested, it is clear that its members are apt to sink to the level at which they are placed by the popular odium. And if a Jew could scarcely persuade himself that it was right to pay taxes, how much more heinous a crime must it have been in his eyes to become the questionably-honest instrument for collecting them? If a publican was hated, how still more intense must have been the disgust entertained against a publican who was also a Jew? (p. 199)

Geikie:
  
Capernaum had a strong staff of custom-house officers, or publicans.   Much goods, merchandise and traffic flowed through it and dues and fees were required on most of it.   There were tolls on the highways, the bridges, docks at the lake and various other locations where payments of duty were required.   The Roman contracts required set amounts to be paid…anything extra they could charge and collect could kept as payment for their services.   This obviously opened the door for much fraud and animosity.

This was a critical time for Jesus, and his admission of a publican as a disciple could not fail to irritate his enemies still more, but he had not hesitation in his course. Sent to the lost, he gladly welcomed to his inmost circle one of their number in whom he saw the germs of true spiritual life, in calm disregard of all prejudices of the time.

It was natural that Matthew should celebrate an event so unique as his call by a great feast at his house; and no less so that he should invite a large number of his class to rejoice with him at the new era opened to him/them, or that he should extend the invitation to his friends of the proscribed classes generally … persons branded by public opinion as “sinners.” To the Rabbis, and the Pharisees at large, nothing could be more unbecoming and irregular than the presence of Jesus at Matthew’s feast. To be Levitically “clean” was the supreme necessity of their religious lives. (p.401)

Note: I first read Papini’s book, “Life of Christ” in 1958.  I very much enjoyed the style of writing, it’s beauty, and the feelings of love for the Savior which I felt from the author’s words. I include a couple of paragraphs, hopefully, for your enjoyment.   

“Matthew is the dearest of all the Twelve. He was a tax-gatherer, a sort of under-publican, and probably had more education than his companions. He followed Jesus as readily as the fishermen. “And after these things he went forth, and saw a publican name Levi, sitting at the receipt of custom:  and he said unto him, follow me. And he left all, rose up, and followed him. And Levi made him a great feast in his own house.” It was not a heap of torn nets which Matthew left, but a position, a stipend, secure and increasing earnings.

            “Giving up riches is easy for a man who has almost nothing. Among the Twelve Matthew was certainly the richest before his conversion. Of no other is it told that he could offer a great feast, and this means that he made a greater and more meritorious sacrifice by his rising at the first call from the seat where he was collecting money.”

“Matthew and Judas were perhaps the only ones of the Disciples who knew how to write, and to Matthew we owe the first collection of Logia or memorable sayings of Jesus. In the Gospel which is called by his name, we find the most complete text of the Sermon on the Mount. Our debt to the poor excise-man is heavy; without him many words of Jesus, and the most beautiful, might have been lost. This handler of drachmas, shekels and talents, whom his despised trade must have predisposed to avarice, has laid up for us a treasure worth more than all the money coined on the earth.” (p. 228)

Edersheim:  

The term Pharisee means “separated one,” setting ones-self apart. This implies the Pharisee wants no contact, nothing to do with these unworthys; the exclusion of sinners. This was a main point of contention between them and Jesus. By calling Matthew (a publican, a sinner) to Jesus’ inner circle, Jesus would be knowingly attacking a very basic tenet of their doctrine. The actions and teachings of Christ are an absolute and fundamental contrariety to that of the Rabbis. This also sends a message to others who are ostracized by the Jews that they too may be welcome in this new gospel. (p. 508)

Glenn R. McGettigan
             August 2015; Revised October 2015
            
References:

“Our Lord of the Gospels.” Clark
“Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah.” Edersheim
“Life of Christ.” Farrar    
“Life of Christ.” Geike   
“Doctrinal New Testament Commentary.” Volume 1. McConkie
“Mortal Messiah.” Book 2. McConkie
“Matthew: A New Translation.” Albright & Mann    
“Life of Christ.” Papini